But I think Stephen Moore has the more credible objection: how can you go in and renegotiate people’s mortgages? Can the government get me $100 off the TV I bought last year? If you want to bail folks out, that is dumb but legal (by today’s lax standards).
I just don’t get how can rewrite an existing contract and proscribe a lender from adjusting a rate in accordance with a signed contract. That is a lot scarier than a stupid bailout plan.
And why would the government interfere? In order to avoid a recession. Or not. From the LATimes we hear of a study saying that there will be no recession in 2008.
Despite rising oil prices, sinking housing prices and a turbulent stock market, the national economy will be saved by some of its apparent weak spots, the quarterly UCLA Anderson forecast stated.
This sounds like another major/critical/end of the world sort of thing where you need government interference.
Let’s all meet in Bali and legislate people to start living like cavemen in order to avoid global warming that has already started and which may or may not be an ok thing depending upon which predictions you’re reading or where you live.
As world leaders scramble to address global warming, sceptical environmentalist Bjoern Lomborg finds himself increasingly alone in his claim that climate change poses no imminent threat to the planet.
Lomborg, author of the best-selling book “The Sceptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World,” acknowledges that the climate is warming but insists greenhouse gases “are not the priority over all priorities.”
The 42-year-old Dane, who once headed Denmark’s Environmental Assessment Institute, has for years been speaking out against the increasingly mainstream concern that global warming is causing sea levels to rise and changing weather patterns in a way that will soon wreak havoc on world ecosystems and all of humankind.
“There are other global challenges to address this century like the battle against AIDS, malaria, malnutrition and poverty,” he told AFP.
1-You are not going to get people in poverty to give a hoot about global warming. They are concerned with eating and having a roof over their heads.
2-You are going to get rich people to holler about global warming as long as they don’t really have to do much about it. (too many examples to site here)